Motion Sickness in EVs Emerges as New User Pain Point, Automakers Launch “Anti-Nausea” Modes

电动车晕车成新痛点,车企开启“防晕”模式竞赛

近年来,越来越多电动车用户在社交媒体上吐槽“坐电车就晕车”,头晕、恶心、胸闷等不适感成为出行新痛点。相关数据显示,约有 38% 的电动车乘客存在晕车困扰,其中以家庭乘员为主。

电动车更易引发晕车的根源在于:首先,电动车的加速响应迅速、推背感强,乘客的前庭系统与视觉难以及时协调;其次,其动能回收系统在松开油门时产生突然减速度,也会引发身体被拉拽的不适;此外,为支撑沉重电池包,电动车悬架普遍调校偏硬,对日常行驶中最易诱发晕车的2-5 Hz低频振动过滤不足,使乘坐体验进一步恶化。

为应对这一痛点,多家车企已推出“防晕车”技术方案。东风日产率先发布“全域智能防晕车系统”,通过智能蠕行、悬架六向加速度控制、导航联动及天然缓晕香氛等措施,使晕车指数据称下降约52%。广汽本田在其新推出的电动车型中搭载自适应电磁悬架、五维一体动力底盘协同逻辑,宣称可将晕车概率降低72%。同时,小鹏、长安、小米等品牌也纷纷推出AI算法控制、底盘调校、能量回收优化等“舒缓晕车”模式。

“防晕车”并非单项功能,而是一套跨学科系统工程,涉及动力响应、悬架控制、人机交互及座舱感知等多维技术。随着抗晕性能行业标准的制定推进,“晕车指数”有望成为未来舒适性评测的新指标。

An increasing number of EV users are reporting dizziness and nausea during rides—a growing comfort concern in the age of electrified mobility. Data shows that around 38% of EV passengers experience motion sickness, especially among family riders.

The reasons EVs may trigger motion sickness more easily include: (1) ultra-responsive acceleration that causes a mismatch between vestibular and visual inputs; (2) aggressive regenerative braking that produces sudden deceleration forces; and (3) chassis tuning that, to support heavy battery packs, favors stiff suspensions with insufficient filtering of low-frequency (2–5 Hz) vibrations. Together these factors intensify sensory conflict and discomfort.

In response, automakers have rolled out “anti-motion-sickness” solutions. Dongfeng Nissan introduced an “All-Domain Intelligent Anti-Nausea System,” combining smart creeping, six-axis acceleration control, navigation linkage and natural aroma to claim a ~52% reduction in motion-sickness index. GAC Honda’s new EV features an adaptive electromagnetic suspension and a five-dimensional powertrain–chassis coordination logic, claiming up to a 72% reduction in incidence. Likewise, XPeng, Changan, Xiaomi and others offer AI algorithms, refined suspension calibration, and tuned regeneration strategies.

“Anti-nausea” innovation is no longer a marketing term but a multidimensional engineering challenge, combining powertrain control, suspension systems, and human-centered cabin design. With new evaluation standards under development, motion-sickness performance may soon become a formal comfort benchmark.

Share the Post:
滚动至顶部